The audit answers one question — is this crop worth considering on this land — and shows the evidence it used to answer it. Every output states its source, its date and what it cannot tell you.
Over 220 crop reference profiles scored against the location you select, with the reasons behind each score visible rather than a bare number.
Soil indicators and seasonal climate for the coordinate, with the source, its resolution and what a mapped estimate cannot tell you about your specific parcel.
What each shortlisted crop demands in labour, establishment time and ongoing operations, so a high biological score is not mistaken for an easy crop.
Yield, cost and price assumptions you can replace with your own records before treating any margin as a real number.
It is decision support, not certification. Mapped soil describes a broad area rather than your parcel, modelled economics are assumptions rather than quotes, and nothing here confirms land title, water rights, legal permission to plant, disease status or a buyer. Use the result to decide which questions deserve a laboratory test, a site visit or professional advice. Read the methodology for sources, resolution and scoring.
Here it means a location-level screening report: you give a coordinate or field area, and the audit compares mapped soil and climate evidence against crop reference profiles to produce a ranked shortlist with stated assumptions, sources and confidence.
A location is enough to start — drop a pin or enter coordinates. Everything else is optional: entering your own yield, cost and price figures replaces the benchmark assumptions and makes the economic output meaningful for your farm.
The Free plan includes five new-location audits each month. Grower includes 50 per month under fair use plus the full crop-monitoring workflow. No credit card is required to start and complete data export is included on both plans.
No. Mapped soil data describes a broad area, not your parcel. The audit tells you which questions are worth paying to answer; a laboratory soil test, field inspection and local agronomic advice answer them.
Treat it as a screening input, not due diligence. It does not confirm land title, legal permission to plant, water rights, disease status or a buyer contract, and it is not a certification. Use it to decide what deserves professional verification.
They are modelled from reference costs and price ranges, not quotes. They are only as good as the assumptions behind them, which is why every input is editable and every figure carries its source and date.